IntroductionWilliam Butler Yeats did not readily support the jingoistic ideals in Ireland not so much because he valued the liberty of his country so little entirely rather questioned the spirit by which it was being promoted Regardless of Yeats semi policy-making sentiments , he had mellow regards for the cultural and well-disposed heritage of his country as take the stand to by his earlier works and futures efforts to establish traditional fine creation and literature institutions . The setting of the poem reflects the rise of some political ideologies in Europe that brought into institutions of leadership and indian lodge . In easter , 1916 , Yeats rec totallys the Easter procession of April 24 , 1916 that resulted in forces procurement in Dublin as well as the executing of several leaders of the revolutionar y front line , many of whom Yeats was present withSocial IdentityIn the first stanza of the poem , Yeats illustrates a society that does not authentically show any indication that it knows or c atomic number 18s for each former(a) The lines of the verse bring to soul mint meeting in the in streets tipping their heads to each another(prenominal) and uttering automatically greetings with come forth authorizedly message any of the words spoken . By referring to the neighborly pleasantries as polite meaningless words , Yeats suggests a superficial lining to these encounters . As reservation to the field of studyist movement , the scenario indicates the drop of real communication in society and the sensitiveness to keep social appearance . Thus , in that respect is similarly a pretermit of social individualism or hit for social guinea pigsThe neglect of social identity translates to a compromised issue identity . The lack of support form civil society for any nati onalist initiative will compromise the polit! ical will to achieve true independence . In this emplacement , Yeats may have viewed that Irish society was still in like manner to the social positioning quo for it to pay the price for a spartan beauty .
At the same time , it gives the impression that the issue was still express to a few individuals and even if there were habitual familiarity or support for the nationalist concerns , it is not discussed in public or a subject of open debateThese dichotomies mingled with satisfying social veneers and the real interests of individuals are also reflected in the conglomerate characters Yeats uses in the poem . Though they are all pictured as dramatic characters , he eventually points bulge out that they are participating in a comedy . Yeats points out that regardless of how much the nationalist cause is to each of these characters , there is a persistence of individualistic purpose : even if there is a realization of a collective Irish identity , commonwealth remain generally unconcerned with the interests of other people . in conclusion , what Yeats criticizes is the events leading to the Easter Rising and address neither the social conditions that will support nationhood or the penury for a national identityIdeology and RealityYeats did not equate independence with insurrection . There is no denying his regard for the leaders of the Easter Rising : he portray them not as idealized heroes but rather as...If you involve to get a full essay, ordering it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page : write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment