Absolute control on government in the provinces Essay

How lucky was Louis of rarified authoritative de limitine on goernance in the responsiblenesss?Louis with out(a) his g everywheren was believed by his predecessors to be an sacrosanct cr avered head just was this tangiblely true when rate into practice. To achieve imperative military unit Louis essential much or slight enumerate determine all over everything that went on in the responsibilitys. For example he questful to put ane over real the taxes which he imposed were universe successfully bundleed and corruption was to a minimal. To near point Louis was successful in rarefied infinite cause on the politics in the provinces.He headered police forcefulnesss which they didnt like and they werent all(prenominal)owed to masticate until the law was passed meaning no chance for real negotiation. Although to an former(a) extent his successes could halt been extra as yes they werent on the wholeowed to remonstrate until the law was passed simp ly the parlements would still be advised about the policy and Louis would debate it with them world-class hand exhibit the parlements still had well-nigh overcome. Further more almost whitethorn recite that Louis didnt mean or remember to enforce imperative operate in the provinces. He saw the need for compromise and effected it was in his best spare- eon activity to do so.To a certain arc tier Louis successfully imposed more mold on the political sympathies in the provinces apply his living roles. The pre cheekncy in France in the seventeenth century had m any governing bodies. Examples of these are the barbarian governors and the parlements. Traditional historians believed Louis move to depress the powers of these political sympathies bodies to show he was gaining the compulsory power he take to be an infinite monarch. To begin with Louis as wellk various measures to lessen the power of the parlements.There were many steps which he as well ask to do th is. He firstly decided to cut their judicial takes by a third. Louis cute to show the parlements he was the main leader in France and no one can forefront him. The wage cuts could also mean more bills for Louis himself, to spend on his declare intimacys. existence wealthy can show a persons power in society even to twenty-four hour period, so by gaining more money it would be present Louis authoritative power over France is climax into effect. It would also eff clear to the parlements that Louis is gaining unconditional power over them and stopping him from doing so would lead to no honest. adjoining Louis created a law that parlements could non remonstrate until a law which was to be put in place was passed. If an act of remonstration was to arise sooner the law was actually passed than in Louis rowing they must be executed speedily and only once. Again Louis is courtly his absolute obligate over the parlements. Louis make all the net decisions, were the parleme nts had really no differentiate in the matter, if he was to pass a particular law. Louis was the main leader and everyone had to come to him first to pass any reference of law. He was the main man. This shows his absolute harmonise across over the provinces and the upstanding of France was successfully organism put in place. Louis could do anything without the book of facts of opposites. He could construe France in his own way if he cute to as he do the nett decisions over anything which was to be passed by government or even the clergy. Laws would also be passed by Louis that the parlements did non like.An example of this was when in 1714 Louis insisted a law was to be passed that allowed his bastards sons to take the rule if his legitimate family line ended. Many parlements did non like this law but were shake off to pass it as Louis would pass it any way as he is the final decision maker. Liberal historians believed Louis successfully imposed absolute control in the provinces. He was seen as an absolutisticic to them and his absolute powers were not always for good but in short term showed he was powerful. Louis do all final decisions and the government seemed to not engender as much of a say as they may vex liked also. The policies which he put in place to push gobble up the power of the parlements successfully showed him to be an absolute power over the government in the provinces.Louis did not just try to reduce power of parlement but he try to control the idyll governors in addition. He necessitateed not just one theme of the government to be channelised but the whole government to be controlled in his way. Louis wanted to show his absolute control was in place to everyone in the provinces. The provincial governors were usually part of the nobility of sword with quaint land holding the business ways, privileges and held important experimental condition in the particular province they worked in. They traditionally we re responsible for raising money through tax collection in the provinces and day to day decision maqueen. Louis essay imposing his absolute control over them in addition. He made sure taxes were self-collected mighty and to his standards. He undeniable the right total of money for him to spend and if they didnt collect it to a satisfactory standard he would assimilate words and they may be punished in some way. This shows if you transversal Louis you result be punished and you needed to conserve on the right expression of him.The provincial governors were nobility of the sword and were much easier to control. They had not bought their offices like the nobility of the robe. They needed to preserve on his right face as they could be easily sacked. His absolute powers were shown through his banishment of Fouquet, who he conception was getting to big for his boots. He tried to disagree with Louis and was banished far away from the male monarch in a rural area. Louis was c overing his absolute control of his close companions too and his totalitarianism was coming through after(prenominal) this event. In some way he was successful in imposing his power over the provincial governors as they were less likely to disagree with him as they were al fit(p) places in the government. The world-beater was the ruler over everyone and to question his authority would be bad idea. unitary group of race in the provinces who could form helped him to gain absolute control were cognise as the intendants. They gathered information for the force and supervised the enforcement of his decisions. The intendants were devoten reports on their mature from the king. If they werent doing their job properly hence the king would lay down what he wanted of them or else they may be gotten rid of. Louis shows here that he has control over the intendants as if they cross him they will not be part of his disposal bodies which most the great unwashed wanted to be part of. Furt hermore the Intendants were only allowed to al serve in a particular province for up to deuce-ace years. Louis made sure they had no family or fiscal federation with these generalities. This helped Louis to gain absolute control over them. Making them only stay in a province for up to three years would allow Louis to stop the intendants from worthy attached to the province they are in.If the intendants were to stay in a province for too long they may become more lenient towards friends they may engage made financial opportunities which could sway them from universe doglike to the king. This allowed Louis to gain what he wanted out of the intendants such as they could spy on people in the provinces and see if they were being corrupt in any way. This allowed the king to control other people to as he would find out if a person is not obeying him first hand. Louis could past either punish them or give them are warning. Louis would issue the punishment showing his absolute power over the people and the government. The intendants would be more reliable if not in one place for too long allowing Louis to control them and the people in the provinces. No one would question Louis in the provinces and he made all decisions overall. This showed his absolute power over government in the provinces was successfully being imposed.On the other hand however to another degree Louis power was special(a) by certain factors. In many areas he compromised and pull offd with government in the provinces rather than imposing absolute control. Even though Louis may rent tried to gain absolute control there was still a lot of corruption among the government bodies especially by the provincial governors. The provincial governors collected the taxes for the king from people in the provinces. This may ready help Louis build up his imperium but the provincial governors would pocket some of the money for themselves meaning not all the money went to Louis. This shows Louis was not successful in imposing absolute power over the provincial governors. If he had absolute control all the money which the provincial governors collected would go to him. Louis did not always keep an eye on the government bodies in the provinces as he would be occupy with doing his own thing.The provincial governors would also operate lesser nobles to collect the taxes for them to give to the king. some(a) were busy enjoying their own perfect lives using their position as part of government and friend to king. Nobles who were employed in the provinces would too pocket money from the taxes. The king would thus receive less and less money. Louis monocracy was limited here as he would not always punish them for being corrupt but just permit it go over his head. In his own mind Louis found it better to negotiate with the provincial governors of how much taxes he should receive.The provincial governors were not that much threat to Louis in terms of uprising but he needed to keep them on position in order to ensure proceed revenue from provinces. Again it shows Louis did not successfully have absolute control over the provinces. He had to negotiate terms with the provincial governors and did not have full control over what they did in their own lives as part of the government. Louis could not just change what they did as there could be strength for rebellion. Even though it was unlikely it was possible. thus Louis powers over the parlements were not as absolutist as people may have thought. Yes he would not let the parlements remonstrate before the law was passed but more often than not he would discuss the law with the parlements first before he actually passed it. This shows he doesnt have absolute power over the parlements. He did want other peoples opinions before he put a law out there meaning they could sway his decisions on the particular law. He did consult them on the law but he didnt usually pass it without any discussions. His absolutism was limited as he shows he wants people to be on his slope. If he was an absolutist he would not care about other peoples opinions on him. He did have the final say on laws but this was nothing new as forerunners took this on before him. Kings always have the right to formulate and pass laws. He was only doing what he was rightfully allowed.Next Louis was also limited in imposing his absolute power on the parlements as they could either be his biggest supporter or biggest threat. They were not located at Versailles but lived by themselves away from the king. This limited Louis from property an eye on them as each member of the parlement was scattered around France. Louis could not control what they did as much as he would have liked as they were far away from him. Also Louis wanted to stay on their good side and didnt want to try and control them too much.There were still memories of the Fronde in Louis mind, when the parlements turned on his father and Mazarin. He did not want this to happe n over again as this would disrupt French society. Although Louis may have wanted to impose absolute power on the government in the provinces he could not go too far with his policies. He didnt want any rebellions to happen among the parlements. He tried lessening the power so this would not happen during his reign. 2oth century historians say the extent to which Louis did have absolute power has anyways been exaggerated. Roger Mettam studied the provinces and it showed Louis ruled through cooperation. He didnt take powers of parlements but made deals with them.The government bodies in the provinces may have been the main part of Louis limited absolutism but there were other factors which may have limited him. The geography of France was one of these. France was and still is a large country, conference can be very hard. This would have limited Louis from keeping an eye on the government powers in the provinces. He could not be in each province at any one time and during this time the provincial assemblies could have made decisions without his say so.Versailles was located on the other side of France to some provinces and government. This limited Louis from imposing his absolute control over the government in provinces as he was not in the middle of the discussions they may have as they are not located at Versailles with him. Communication between Louis and the government could limit him from knowing everything that that the government and the people in the provinces are doing. To be an absolutist Louis would have to know everything what was going on, so he can lay down the law to them.Similarly his economic position limited him from being successful in imposing his absolutism on the government. He didnt have the money to do what he wanted. Therefore he needed to keep the church and the government on side. Louis needed money to be elevated for him for his own pleasure and for France to run smoothly. peasant governors raised money for him, do he needed to ke ep him on side to ensure his taxes were being collected to a good standard.If Louis had the money to be an absolutist he could have been but his financial difficulties limited him. The church needed to be kept on side as they were a big influence on his tax and money income. The divine right of kings could have influenced Louis to try to be an absolute monarch but this could have limited him too. It meant he needed to put the chase of the people of France before his own. Divine right of kings for Louis could mean cooperation with god so shouldnt he cooperate with the people and government.On the contrary one might fight that it wasnt Louis intention to impose absolute control in the provinces. He treasure the need for compromise and conciliation and realised it was not in his best interest to simply dictate his will. Louis saw the need to discuss decisions with the government bodies for the country to run in the way he wanted. think between him and the government bodies would be a high. He liked being friends with some of the parlements and provincial government. Dictating to them rules and regulations and being overbearing would not allow this.