Internet Privacy: Government Should Not Regulate Encryption or Cryptogr

Internet Privacy Goernment Should Not Regulate encryption or CryptographyPrivacy rights have been an important issue by out time, and it has been increasing in importance as we have move into the electronic/ training age. Keeping that solitude had become a growing concern for many businesses and consumers. With both the information being sent crossways the web, people are very concerned about their personal information falling into the wrong hands. One way to help protect your privacy on the net is by using an encryption program. Even though they are non completely unbreakable, an encryption program is one of the beat out ways to protect against outside intrusions. Despite this fact, the government wants too swan legislation on encryption services that can be a potential danger to both the development of encryption systems and to your rights. According to the ACLU, the Clinton memorial tablet adopted the Clipper Chip plan in 1993. This proposal would learn every user of e ncryption to vow the government their decryption keys. This, essentially, would give the government free access to all private and non-private communications, both stored and real-time. This is the eq of the government requiring all homebuilders to embed microphones in the walls of homes and apartments. ( ACLU White Paper man-sized Brother in the Wires Wiretapping in the Digital Age ). in that location was similarly a proposal for the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). This FBI-based justness would require the telecommunications industry to build enhanced digital wiretapping capabilities into the Nations telephone system. (EFF tug Release & Joint EFF/ACLU/EPIC Statement on ACP) There has been strong opposition to this plan. Many peopl... ...o force encryption users to hand over their decryption keys. It seems as though the government is really more rivet on spying on citizens than it is about fighting crime. There does not appear to be any sufficient proof to justify their rubric to need decryption keys to fight crime and terrorism (especially terrorism). I confide that if the government wants to use electronic surveillance on encrypted information, for a excusable reason, then they should work in correspondence with encryption system users. I feel that privacy is a very important right of all people and people should be able to try and protect it to the outmatch of their ability, as long as no one else gets hurt in the process. Peoples rights to privacy should not be taken so lightly by our government. I would think that Bill Clinton, of all people, would understand the want, and need, for privacy.