Saturday, February 9, 2019

War from the 16th Century to the Invention of Gunpowder Essay -- Artil

War from the 16th Century to the art of GunpowderThe invention of the powerful weapon system guns would change mans role in warring engagements. The artillery guns at first were actually limited by their own design. The guns were very heavy and had to be transported by water, which meant that only towns and fortresses that were close to a body of water could be attacked with artillery also known as the cannon. There were also some fortresses that were fast to the early cannon attacks based on strong designs or subjective defenses. The French were able to penetrate the round shaped castles and large walls during the previous(a) 1400s by using concentrated fire of several small guns instead of a few large ones. A late design of smaller walls that were built in uneven lines, like a star shape, was implemented to strengthen the area called crownworks or hornworks. Other modifications of new designs included deject and thicker walls, gun towers that projected at an angle, i ntervals of guns for fields of fire, wide and deep ditches, and pillboxes. Of line of reasoning with the new design of castles came new slipway to attack. Some effective ways to attack these castles, but also rare ways to attack, were by surprise, by storm, or by treachery. The most common way to attack the castles were keen-sighted term engagements that consisted of either surrounding the castle or getting in close enough that the castles guns would be ranged over the position. The long-term methods consisted of starving protrude the population, forcing surrender, or by mining and bombardment from close range. The use of firepower also began to put an end to the use of headlong charges and hand-to-hand combat during the spiritual rebirth years. The differences between firearms and the bow were obscene at the beginning of the rifles evolution. An archer could accurately hit a target at lengths of two hundred meters and discharge ten arrows a minute, whereas the arqueb us, or rifleman, only had accuracy at 100 meters and took several minutes to reload. Although the new weapons at primacy did not clear the accuracy or the range of the bow, the Italians immediately implemented them into their arsenals. The greatest utility of the early rifles was that the weapon could be mastered in a question of months, but it could take up to ten years to master the bow. last the muskets overtook the battlefield, replacing t... ...rength of China laid in the overwhelming amounts of personnel dower in the armed forces. Japan made quick use of the new weapons, but concentration was not focused on rapid reloading. The Nipponese put more training into accuracy and developed the volley in order to maintain a succession of well-aimed shots. The castles of Japan were also modify to sustain against any type of horizontal attack. The walls were built in prior of the hills and backed strongly by the earth. Once stability was restored the Japanese empire be gan a phase of demilitarization by outlawing guns, tearing down fortifications of defeated enemies, and grim books concerning military matters. In both empires of the Far East, sieges were made by mount assaults, mining, or blockades rather than by bombardment.WORKS CITEDParker, Geoffrey. The armed services Revolution MilitaryInnovation and the Rise of the West 1500-1800.(Cambridge, United KingdomCambridge University Press,1996). Chap 1-4Preston, Richard A., Alex Roland, and Sydney F. Wise. handsIn Arms A History of Warfare and its interrelationshipsWith Western Society. (Belmont, atomic number 20Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2001). Chap 8

No comments:

Post a Comment